I have decided to dedicate this page to my late husband Lesley Sekoto who died in a car accident on 8th July 2017.
Sunday, 29 December 2013
The delicious rot by Matuba Mahlatjie
One man tweeted that he was inspired by the courage of women who were politically active in the 1950s. She used Ms Winnie Madikizela-Mandela as an example. My head started playing slideshows of Mama Albertina Sisulu, Ruth First, Helen Joseph and many others. They all fought back against the evil apartheid government.
Today we are unfortunate because we have no such women. A whole generation faded with time. They are replaced with women who glorify patriarchy. They are replaced by men and women who will suppress conscience so they can make a living in the new free South Africa. The South Africa that those brave women hoped for all those many difficult years ago.
I know you are anxious and want me to get to the point. Let me remind you how we continue to blame Israel and other countries that sponsored apartheid. Directly and indirectly, we condemn them up to this day.
But we continue to sponsor unemployment, poverty and corruption. Whether it is directly or indirectly. We do it. If we let a family from Asia that has influence over our government so it can make money and do nothing about it, it means we are comfortable with bullshit. It gets worse because some the most principled people I know have have swapped their principles for money. They are now on the payroll of people who have contaminated our democracy. It is my belief that if that is the case, we too sponsor the ills that plague our hard-earned freedom.
Nelson Mandela was no saint, but he had principles. He turned down freedom because it was at the expense of his comrades. We would never turn down an offer to advance ourselves. Even if it is at the expense of others. We would rather be in make-up in front of cameras and repurposing what should be stories.
The factory that manufactured Compassion must have shut down in the 1950s. The few good people that are left are in the background. They are worn out from swimming against a massive tide of corruption, poverty and unemployment. The one that we subconsciously sponsor. We are almost the like parasites that feed on a corpse. Because the rot is so delicious. It's better than making our own kill amd sharing it.
The delicious rot by Matuba Mahlatjie
One man tweeted that he was inspired by the courage of women who were politically active in the 1950s. She used Ms Winnie Madikizela-Mandela as an example. My head started playing slideshows of Mama Albertina Sisulu, Ruth First, Helen Joseph and many others. They all fought back against the evil apartheid government.
Today we are unfortunate because we have no such women. A whole generation faded with time. They are replaced with women who glorify patriarchy. They are replaced by men and women who will suppress conscience so they can make a living in the new free South Africa. The South Africa that those brave women hoped for all those many difficult years ago.
I know you are anxious and want me to get to the point. Let me remind you how we continue to blame Israel and other countries that sponsored apartheid. Directly and indirectly, we condemn them up to this day.
But we continue to sponsor unemployment, poverty and corruption. Whether it is directly or indirectly. We do it. If we let a family from Asia that has influence over our government so it can make money and do nothing about it, it means we are comfortable with bullshit. It gets worse because some the most principled people I know have have swapped their principles for money. They are now on the payroll of people who have contaminated our democracy. It is my belief that if that is the case, we too sponsor the ills that plague our hard-earned freedom.
Nelson Mandela was no saint, but he had principles. He turned down freedom because it was at the expense of his comrades. We would never turn down an offer to advance ourselves. Even if it is at the expense of others. We would rather be in make-up in front of cameras and repurposing what should be stories.
The factory that manufactured Compassion must have shut down in the 1950s. The few good people that are left are in the background.
Friday, 20 December 2013
Matters of the heart by Matuba Mahlatjie
I have been confronted with cases of women, most of them great people, whom I thought were happy telling me that they are actually working hard to keep their relationships intact. It almost sounded like it was a second job they could not abscond from. To them, it was important for everyone to believe that everything is good. Giving the impression that they are happier and taken care of. I know all about loving the wrong people. Investing time, emotions and sometimes money in a relationship that I sometimes knew deep down it would not materialise. That's a lesson I took from all the bad blood that was between myself and my ex-boyfriends. I stopped being dishonest about my feelings. I stopped giving everyone the wrong impression. While others will scavenge on the rough patch I was going through, some really reached out and helped me out of the pit I was in. It's about choices; you choose the stuff that's gonna make you and loose the ones that will break you. You make it easy for people to love you. More especially when you love yourself.
So here is my advise to young women and men who enter relationships, those who marry or commit themselves to other people. And to those who lie.
There is no such thing as an "open marriage". Divorce is open. Marriage is pretending, denial. Someone would say this is a bit cynical thing to say. But once two people admit that it's not what they want, to wake up with the same person in perpetuity, the choice becomes either divorce or compromise. It's much easier to pretend. Isn't it? Get a big house, buy nice things, go on expensive trips. All the trappings of a happy life. The problem comes when you get caught. When Others know that you were never really happy. Your facade has been broken. It wasn't enough, you screwed around and now you got caught and everyone knows. Make smart choices. Matters of the heart require tact. Save yourself. Love yourself. Respect others and be honest to you especially.
Tuesday, 3 December 2013
E-Tolls: We are the wives of the governors. All of us!
Tuesday, 26 November 2013
How we breed rapists
Friday, 30 August 2013
Dr Louise Mabille's racist remarks translated by Karin Labuschagne
Friday, 9 August 2013
May the ghost of Charlotte Maxeke haunt Vavi, the ANC & others
Monday, 8 July 2013
Nokuzola Mndende on the Mandela tug of war
The family feud over the bones of the deceased children of Nelson Mandela has raised many questions about the status of African culture and indigenous spirituality.
In fact this public spat is not only an embarrassment to the Mandela family and abaThembu in general, it is also a bad reflection on the status of African culture.
Speaking about individual rights to decide where the deceased should be buried is new in African culture and is based on arrogance and male chauvinism.
In fact it is an imported version of western democracy imposed over African culture, as decisions about custom and tradition are made by the family collective.
Family in African culture does not refer to the nuclear family as portrayed by the west; by family it means all those who are unified by blood irrespective of gender.
Each member has a specific role to play so that the clan remains solid.
The language used in the debates is also crucial as no one should speak in the first person singular (“my grandfather”). Madiba is a grandfather to many, no individual owns Madiba – he is the father to Makaziwe, Zenani, Zindzi; and a grandfather to their children including those of his deceased children.
One must understand that no children born within the family should be discriminated against, whether they are born of sons or daughters.
It is during certain cultural and social responsibilities that duties are allocated according to birthright, but all those decisions are controlled by the family. If any person abuses their responsibilities, it is also the responsibility of the family to remove that person and replace them with another on whom they agree.
The drama of the exhuming of bones by an individual from Qunu to Mvezo, and re-exhuming them to move them back to Qunu, poses some spiritual problems regarding the traditions of African culture, as the belief in “bones” is a basic cornerstone of Africans’ lives.
In African culture death does not mean the destruction of life. It marks the physical separation of the individual from this physical life and the joining of their soul with the spiritual world of ancestors.
This transition of the soul from this world to another world is reflected in the metaphors used when somebody has passed on which symbolise that life is not destroyed but is somewhere.
It is said that the person:
- Uhambile: Has left.
- Usishiyile: Has left us.
- Akasekho: Is not around around us but is somewhere else.
- Uswelekile: Is scarce.
Bones of the deceased are treated with respect and are believed to represent an immortal soul. Because of their immortal nature, bones are believed to have an ability to speak (ayathetha), hear (ayeva) when someone is speaking to them and see (ayabona).
When members of the family invoke ancestors they refer to them as the bones who are able to move (ayashukuma).
Ukushukuma (literally meaning shaking, moving or vibrating) of bones means that they are responding to whatever situation needs their intervention or response.
Because of these features, it is believed that ancestors (the bones) can reward, heal, protect and punish the living.
Ancestors, which are central in African beliefs, are symbolised by the bones that are “sleeping” peacefully. Disturbing the “bones” is not allowed as that implies disturbing the soul of the deceased.
So when someone dies far from home, the family of the deceased performs a ritual of spiritually bringing them home.
Using the branches of a special tree called umphafa as a spiritual medium, the family members take their spirit home.
They speak to them over their grave and tell them the reasons for these actions.
But in extreme cases, like when the deceased wants their remains to be taken “home”, or the family want to know where the “bones” of their loved one are “sleeping”, the family exhume the bones – but this is a collective decision.
Though am not a Mandela, I am an African who practises African culture and spirituality. I think the Mandela elderly should further educate the chief, as some of his statements are not correct.
His exclusion of his uDadobawo (father’s sister – not aunt) is a mistake. He said that because she is married she must not be involved with the Mandela issues.
That is a grave mistake.
Makaziwe is an umfazi (married woman) to her husband’s family; but she is an intombi (daughter) to the Mandela family. She has specific roles to play. Makaziwe, as the only surviving child of Madiba’s first marriage, has the right to intervene when she sees something going astray.
Makaziwe, Ndaba and Mandla should complement each other as there are many things they must do as a collective.
What Mandla has said in public about his Dadobawo is disrespectful. His statement is based on arrogance, male chauvinism and denial of the truth about the status of Makaziwe, his father’s sibling.
Makaziwe is Mandla’s father, in the true sense of the word, without looking at her gender.
Mandla also said he had the right to determine where his father should be buried. Again this is far from the truth. Makgatho has a father, siblings, and children who are Mandla’s siblings.
There is no way that an individual can claim the absolute right for somebody who is shared by many.
Moreover, Ndaba needs to take the lead despite being younger than Mandla. An heir to traditional leadership in African culture depends on the status of his mother. As Ndaba’s mother was married to Makgatho, Ndaba should lead the traditions and customs of Rholihlahla’s house.
Though Mandla is older, Ndaba qualifies to be given umkhonto (a sacred spear) to kill the sacred animals during their rituals. It is therefore out of line for Mandla to unilaterally exhume the bones.
Makaziwe in fact is the one who is closely attached to those bones as they all came from the same womb.
Finally the Mandela family must go to Madiba and tell him that the bones have been returned to Qunu, and that he will be buried next to his children, so that he can go peacefully.
They must also perform a ritual to apologise to the bones that have been so disturbed, so as to avoid their wrath.
- Mndende is the founder of the Dutywa-based Icamagu Institute in the Eastern Cape and a former religious studies lecturer at the University of Cape Town
Sunday, 23 June 2013
For everyone who prays...
Wednesday, 19 June 2013
The Promised Land: 100-year-old demon
When I was born it was already 70 years since we were condemned to poverty. We were deep in the belly of the evil apartheid era. I am now 30-years-old and that makes today 100 years since the Natives Land Act was passed into law by the all white rulers of our land. We were bulldozed and robbed of our land. Today, for the first time, I read the original text of this piece of legislation. I am bitter that this system was especially meant to set us back. Dumped into a generational crisis that lasted for this long. The dawn of democracy in 1994 was a pacifier for the outspoken. It was a glimmer of hope. Those who screamed "Mayibuye" at the height of apartheid had tears of joy when we cast a vote for the ANC government.